National
JACL Board Reaffirms “American Concentration Camp”
By Mako Nakagawa and Andy Noguchi
We welcome and congratulate the National Japanese American
Citizens League Board, under intense community interest, as it
reaffirmed the three National JACL Council votes to fully implement the
recommended terms American concentration camp, incarceration camp, and
illegal detention center. By doing so, it rejected suggestions from some
national JACL leaders to drop American concentration camp in order to form
a coalition with the American Jewish Committee and others who
have lobbied against the JACL using the term.
The National JACL Board, chaired by JACL President David
Lin, and composed of 15 members, addressed this controversy on Saturday,
February 23, at its quarterly meeting in San Francisco. Craig Tomiyoshi,
Vice President of Public Affairs, presented the JACL Board position of fully
implementing the National Council policy.
Northern Calfornia-Western Nevada-Pacific JACL Governor David
Unruhe also shared a strong resolution from his District urging no omission
of terms. Andy Noguchi, NCWNP JACL District Civil Rights Co-Chair,
represented the concerns of Power of Words advocates.
To be clear on the policy implementation, Noguchi twice
stated to the National Board that this meant that no coalition will be formed
on the basis of dropping American concentration camp. No one
contradicted this meaning.
We wish to thank the many people around the country who
shared their concerns with the National JACL in the days and weeks leading up
to the Board meeting. Some of them include:
- Bruce Embrey, Co-Chair of the Manzanar Committee (Los Angeles)
- Tom Ikeda, Director of Densho (Seattle)
- Tetsuden Kashima, Author and Professor, University of Washington (Seattle)
- Soji Kashiwagi, Playwright and Pasadena Human Rights Commissioner (Los Angeles).
- A. Hirotoshi Nishikawa, 2011-2012 National JACL Power of Words Committee (Philadelphia)
- Stan Shikuma, Co-Chair, Seattle JACL Power of Words Committee
- Hiroshi Shimizu, President of the Tule Lake Committee (San Francisco)
- Barbara Takei, Co-Author of Tule Lake Revisited (Sacramento)
Lin specifically expressed his appreciation to them and
others at the National JACL Board meeting for their valuable input.
This policy reaffirmation validates the democratic vote of
the National Council in three successive years after prolonged thoughtful
discussion, debate, research, and writing. This also sets the stage for the
JACL further implementing the Power of Words.
For example, the National JACL can join ongoing discussions
with the National
Park Service on preservation of confinement sites and how they’re
described, freshly re-armed with the Power of Words. Leading groups such as the
Manzanar Committee and Tule Lake Committee, that have led these efforts for
several decades, will welcome this increased backing from the JACL.
The past three years of the Power of Words movement,
initiated by the Seattle JACL Chapter and the Pacific
Northwest JACL District, has gathered tremendous steam from hundreds
of educators, writers, historians, organizations, JACL Chapters, community
leaders and others across the country. We believe that the JACL and this much
broader coalition now have a great opportunity to further educate the public,
agencies, media, and others about the injustice of the Japanese American World
War II incarceration.
Misleading government euphemisms like relocation camp,
assembly center, and internment camp should no longer be an insurmountable
obstacle to understanding. Ridiculous notions that we were being protected or
pampered will diminish.
Honest terms like American concentration camp,
incarceration camp, illegal detention center, forced removal, and others,
can now truthfully tell a story: How the government used language to cover up
the denial of constitutional rights, the racism, force removal, incarceration,
and oppressive conditions directed against 120,000 innocent people of Japanese
ancestry.
As some, including Tom Ikeda of Densho point out, the term American
concentration camp offers the JACL a teachable moment about how a racial,
religious, ethnic, or other unpopular group can be targeted, imprisoned, and
oppressed.
This is also an opportunity to talk of the inhuman extremes
of Nazi Germany when it imprisoned, tortured, and murdered 11,000,000 innocent
people, including 6,000,000 Jews. We understand that using the term concentration
camps, in that case, is a misleading euphemism for horrendous crimes
against humanity and that many people instead use the terms death and extermination
camps.
Let us hope to now move ahead with full implementation and
that there will be no need to again reaffirm the National JACL Council’s policy
on the Power of Words.
Thank you,
Mako Nakagawa
Seattle JACL Chapter
Seattle Power of Words Committee
National JACL Education Committee (2013)
Mako Nakagawa
Seattle JACL Chapter
Seattle Power of Words Committee
National JACL Education Committee (2013)
Andy Noguchi
Civil Rights Co-Chair
Youth Co-Advisor
Florin JACL Chapter
NCWNP JACL District Civil Rights Co-Chair
National JACL Power of Words Committee (2011-2012)
Civil Rights Co-Chair
Youth Co-Advisor
Florin JACL Chapter
NCWNP JACL District Civil Rights Co-Chair
National JACL Power of Words Committee (2011-2012)
Source: http://blog.manzanarcommittee.org/2013/02/28/national-jacl-board-reaffirms-american-concentration-camp/
1 comment:
As an old “hakujin” who was around when the camps were established, I am not eligible for JACL membership. But I am able to applaud their stance on calling a rose a rose so to speak.
The politically correct terms "relocation camps" and "internees" are far too mild to properly fit the actual events of WWII. Much more accurate words are “concentration camps” and “prisoners,” even though peoples of Jewish ancestry might object. After all, they don’t hold the patent on those words.
When an ethnic group of people are forcibly removed from their homes for no legal reason and placed in barbed wire enclosures with the machine guns pointed inward, they are, in fact, prisoners in a concentration camp. Just like the Jews.
Actually, the whole removal act should more properly be referred to as an American version of Hitler’s holocaust dealing with Jews. Both events started exactly alike. For the gas chambers an ovens of the German version were not in the Nazi leader’s original plans. He simply wished to hold - or concentrate - the Jews until they could be “relocated” - there’s that word again - to territories outside Germany which he would invade and conquer. That plan was changed and the ovens built only after he realized that the logistics of such a move were far too formidable. And, after Germany started to suffer severe manpower shortages in the defense industry.
There is absolutely no difference in the two events except for the “final solution” as Hitler termed it.
Floyd Shirk
Post a Comment